| Component | Current RS | % 1D | % 1W | % 1M | % off 52W H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broad Indices | |||||
| SPYS&P 500 | 50 | −0.23 | +0.47 | +3.73 | −1.29 |
| QQQNasdaq 100 | 34 | −0.67 | +0.42 | +4.81 | −4.3 |
| IWMRussell 2000 | 50 | −1.35 | −1.4 | +1.08 | −3.09 |
| DIADow 30 | 60 | −0.03 | +0.53 | +2.6 | −2.14 |
| Market Segments | |||||
| IWFLarge-cap Growth | 31 | −0.92 | +0.29 | +4.53 | −4.95 |
| IWDLarge-cap Value | 73 | +0.29 | +0.4 | +3.04 | −0.71 |
| MTUMMomentum | 27 | −1.49 | −1.79 | +0.31 | −13.28 |
| SPHBHigh Beta | 36 | −2.22 | −1.54 | +4.61 | −7.2 |
| SPLVLow Volatility | 58 | −0.05 | −0.31 | −1.7 | −4.74 |
| IWOSmall-cap Growth | 43 | −2.07 | −2.18 | +1.45 | −4.48 |
| IWNSmall-cap Value | 59 | −0.71 | −0.74 | +0.61 | −2.07 |
| Equal-Weight Sectors | |||||
| RSPS&P 500 Equal Weight | 63 | −0.34 | −0.44 | +2.47 | −1.23 |
| RSPTTechnology (EW) | 46 | −1.6 | +1.17 | +7.81 | −4.03 |
| RSPFFinancials (EW) | 87 | −0.13 | +0.45 | +1.88 | −0.99 |
| RSPNIndustrials (EW) | 53 | −0.84 | −1.64 | −0.21 | −5 |
| RSPHHealth Care (EW) | 100 | −0.45 | −0.87 | +7.25 | −1.96 |
| RSPDConsumer Discretionary (EW) | 53 | +0.85 | −0.99 | −0.54 | −5.88 |
| RSPSConsumer Staples (EW) | 62 | +0.32 | −1.01 | +0.84 | −6.05 |
| RSPUUtilities (EW) | 33 | −0.94 | −0.08 | −4.43 | −10.09 |
| RSPMMaterials (EW) | 59 | −0.16 | −1.23 | +2.82 | −2.13 |
| RSPGEnergy (EW) | 79 | +0.43 | −0.88 | +7.18 | −2.58 |
| RSPRReal Estate (EW) | 47 | −0.11 | −1.39 | −2.27 | −4.66 |
| RSPCCommunication Svcs (EW) | 44 | +1.01 | +1 | +5.84 | −9.33 |
| Sector SPDRs | |||||
| XLKTechnology | 35 | −1.55 | +1.3 | +5.67 | −6.56 |
| XLFFinancials | 86 | +0.38 | +1.08 | +1.93 | −0.53 |
| XLIIndustrials | 52 | −0.93 | −1.73 | −0.7 | −5.87 |
| XLVHealth Care | 93 | −0.24 | −1.98 | +4.67 | −3.08 |
| XLYConsumer Discretionary | 34 | +1.15 | −0.69 | +4.29 | −6.24 |
| XLPConsumer Staples | 55 | +0.43 | −0.63 | −0.02 | −5.2 |
| XLUUtilities | 32 | −1.04 | −0.09 | −4.32 | −10.61 |
| XLBMaterials | 58 | −0.09 | −0.67 | +2.98 | −1.86 |
| XLEEnergy | 82 | +0.63 | −1.51 | +6.31 | −3.12 |
| XLREReal Estate | 48 | −0.4 | −1.33 | −1.81 | −4.25 |
| XLCCommunication Svcs | 37 | +1.42 | +1.43 | +6.01 | −6.16 |
| Commodities | |||||
| GLDGold (GLD) | 38 | −3.24 | −3.42 | +8.41 | −19.78 |
| USOWTI Crude (USO) | 46 | −0.24 | −3.67 | +1.74 | −15.82 |
| SLVSilver (SLV) | 4 | −4.38 | −4.3 | +12.19 | −45.35 |
| Bitcoin | |||||
| BTC-USDBitcoin | 100 | +1.58 | +4.18 | +24.92 | −36.44 |
Kevin Warsh's first Jackson Hole keynote as Fed chair was the entire session. He told the room inflation is running above the 2% target, that recent readings "do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved," and that unless the Fed is confident inflation is moving to target "clearly and at sufficient speed... we have work to do." BMO's rates desk called it "deliberately hawkish." Equities answered with something closer to a shrug than a flinch: S&P 500 (SPY) 769.29, −0.23%; Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) 716.25, −0.67%; the Dow essentially unchanged. The number that actually tells the story is Russell 2000 (IWM) 295.75, −1.35% — the further you sat from a mega-cap balance sheet, the more this hurt.
So the honest characterization is not risk-off. It was a rate-sensitivity day. Futures repriced a September hike as a genuinely live risk and a hike by December as more likely than not (CME FedWatch, via Kitco and Reuters). The front end did the work: the 2-year jumped roughly 6–8bp toward 4.30% while the 10-year barely moved near 4.67–4.72% and the long bond sat flat-to-lower around 5.17–5.21% (CNBC, Bloomberg). A bear flattener is the bond market saying *tighter for longer now, growth consequences later*. Floating-rate borrowers, unprofitable duration, and small caps are on the wrong side of exactly that. They were exactly what got sold.
Underneath a −0.23% index print sat a violent internal rotation, and it did not run along the usual growth/value line. It ran along the AI capex line.
The second-order read: capital is migrating down the AI stack from the people who buy the compute to the people who bill for the output. That rotation is far more durable than a one-day Fed reaction, and it is being reinforced by a real fear — the roughly $3 trillion of off-balance-sheet AI commitments the Wall Street Journal tallied earlier this month, which has hung over the behind-the-meter and power complex ever since. Hawkish Fed plus questioned capex is a specifically bad combination for anything whose payback lives in 2029.
Equities were an afterthought. GLD −3.24% and SLV −4.38% is where a hawkish Fed actually landed. Spot gold traded down to a one-week low near $4,529 intraday (Kitco) after a run at a three-month high, and silver — August's strongest major asset — gave back more than the metal it usually leads. A no-yield asset repricing against a live hike is textbook, but the *magnitude* relative to a −0.23% S&P is the message: the crowded macro expression of 2026 was long precious metals, and that book got hit far harder than the equity book did.
The curated brief will call this a down day, and it was. But a −0.23% close on the day the Fed chair told you a hike is on the table — with the indices still green on the week — is not distribution. It is a market that has decided the economy is strong enough to eat a hike. The risk is that this is complacency by another name: the front end has repriced, gold has repriced, small caps have repriced. Large-cap equity has not. If Warsh means it, that gap closes from the equity side, not the bond side.
The group led the downside, but the character was profit-taking on a vertical year rather than a fundamental de-rating — a genuinely strong AI-infrastructure print got sold because its payoff was framed as a fiscal-2029 event. Equipment and design names took the worst of it while the largest-cap anchor barely moved, which is the signature of crowded positioning unwinding, not demand rolling over. Prospective semiconductor tariff coverage extending to servers and derivative products is now a live second risk on top of the rates repricing.
The build-out trade is being repriced on financing cost and financing *credibility* at the same time, and this month's reporting on roughly $3 trillion of off-balance-sheet AI commitments is the reason every hyperscaler-capex proxy now trades as one basket. A hawkish front end punishes long-payback capital projects specifically, so this is the corner of AI where the Fed and the fundamentals point the same direction. Note the split: the layer that *spends* on AI fell while the layer that *bills* for AI rallied hard.
The optical-interconnect complex has been the best-performing theme of 2026 on the copper-wall thesis — data movement, not compute, as the binding constraint — and that made it maximum-crowded going into a hawkish catalyst. Today it gave back with the rest of the AI hardware stack, which is what a momentum theme does on a rates day rather than evidence the co-packaged-optics roadmap slipped. The structural story is intact; the positioning story is the one that just changed.
The smaller optical-component and laser end of the market took materially deeper damage than the large-cap photonics names, with double-digit single-day declines in the micro-cap tier. That divergence is a liquidity effect, not an information effect — thin books gap first when a crowded theme de-grosses. Treat it as the high-beta tail of the same trade rather than a separate signal.
Power-for-AI, including the nuclear and behind-the-meter names, sold as a high-beta proxy for hyperscaler capex confidence rather than on anything specific to reactor or generation economics. Nothing today challenged the underlying gigawatt shortfall thesis; what got repriced was the market's willingness to fund a multi-year build at a higher discount rate. A regulated-utility casualty on the tape is a reminder this basket also carries idiosyncratic, non-AI risk that momentum buyers tend to ignore.
The most-hated de-rated theme of the year outperformed decisively on a down tape, with several names posting the kind of gap-ups that only happen when a bearish consensus gets falsified. The catalyst is concrete rather than sentimental — disclosed AI contribution to new bookings is now large enough to argue AI is a demand driver for these platforms rather than their disruptor. This has run for several sessions across earnings, not just today, which is what separates a re-rating from a bounce.
A multi-year laggard caught a real bid on prospective long-term access to Venezuelan reserves, with the modernization of aging production infrastructure as the specific hook. Notably it worked while crude itself was flat-to-lower, meaning the market is paying for the *service* cycle rather than the barrel — a cleaner setup than the usual beta-to-oil trade. Still early and headline-dependent, but the first genuine catalyst this group has had in a while.
Beaten-down footwear, sporting-goods and auto-parts retail names finished green on a session where the broad tape was red and small caps were down over 1%. Relative strength from a group with negative momentum, on a hawkish day that should have hurt consumer-cyclicals, is the kind of non-confirmation worth flagging. One session is not a trend — but it is the first time this theme has acted like a source of funds' opposite.