| Component | Current RS | % 1D | % 1W | % 1M | % off 52W H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broad Indices | |||||
| SPYS&P 500 | 50 | −0.69 | −0.54 | +0.54 | −2.26 |
| QQQNasdaq 100 | 32 | −1.31 | −0.43 | +1.08 | −5.48 |
| IWMRussell 2000 | 48 | −1.16 | −2.89 | −1.91 | −4.79 |
| DIADow 30 | 58 | −0.72 | −1.4 | −0.65 | −3.48 |
| Market Segments | |||||
| IWFLarge-cap Growth | 31 | −1.22 | −0.51 | +0.28 | −6.14 |
| IWDLarge-cap Value | 72 | −0.37 | −0.9 | +0.67 | −1.63 |
| MTUMMomentum | 19 | −1.28 | −1.94 | −1.74 | −14.2 |
| SPHBHigh Beta | 27 | −2.12 | −3.24 | −0.15 | −9.12 |
| SPLVLow Volatility | 63 | −0.2 | −1.45 | −2.19 | −5.43 |
| IWOSmall-cap Growth | 39 | −1.48 | −3.68 | −1.8 | −6.37 |
| IWNSmall-cap Value | 57 | −0.84 | −2.09 | −2.01 | −3.48 |
| Equal-Weight Sectors | |||||
| RSPS&P 500 Equal Weight | 61 | −0.82 | −1.88 | +0.22 | −2.62 |
| RSPTTechnology (EW) | 30 | −2.12 | +0.19 | +3.77 | −5.75 |
| RSPFFinancials (EW) | 85 | −1.24 | −2.46 | −0.72 | −2.94 |
| RSPNIndustrials (EW) | 47 | −1.72 | −3.29 | −5.14 | −7.59 |
| RSPHHealth Care (EW) | 100 | +0.19 | −1.45 | +6.75 | −1.89 |
| RSPDConsumer Discretionary (EW) | 53 | −1.25 | −4.19 | −3.67 | −8.32 |
| RSPSConsumer Staples (EW) | 70 | +0.35 | −1.58 | +1.07 | −6.47 |
| RSPUUtilities (EW) | 38 | +0.78 | −2.03 | −4.58 | −10.84 |
| RSPMMaterials (EW) | 55 | −1.01 | −2.66 | +1.83 | −3.96 |
| RSPGEnergy (EW) | 84 | +1.01 | +4.65 | +10.21 | −0.27 |
| RSPRReal Estate (EW) | 48 | −0.36 | −3.15 | −3.71 | −5.69 |
| RSPCCommunication Svcs (EW) | 43 | −0.98 | −2.85 | +1.78 | −11.23 |
| Sector SPDRs | |||||
| XLKTechnology | 25 | −1.53 | +1.05 | +3.15 | −7.59 |
| XLFFinancials | 86 | −0.88 | −1.9 | −0.31 | −2.07 |
| XLIIndustrials | 46 | −1.37 | −3.18 | −5.69 | −8.22 |
| XLVHealth Care | 100 | +0.66 | −2.07 | +5.81 | −2.79 |
| XLYConsumer Discretionary | 41 | −1.72 | −2.85 | −3.06 | −8.34 |
| XLPConsumer Staples | 63 | +0.32 | −1.47 | +0.46 | −5.42 |
| XLUUtilities | 39 | +0.78 | −1.73 | −4.06 | −10.96 |
| XLBMaterials | 53 | −1.18 | −2.82 | +2.08 | −3.91 |
| XLEEnergy | 88 | +1.27 | +4.37 | +10.17 | −0.28 |
| XLREReal Estate | 53 | −0.16 | −2.91 | −2.52 | −5.2 |
| XLCCommunication Svcs | 41 | −0.52 | −2.03 | −0.41 | −7.91 |
| Commodities | |||||
| GLDGold (GLD) | 37 | −2.86 | −7.32 | +6.74 | −22.16 |
| USOWTI Crude (USO) | 58 | +5.46 | +11.77 | +15.46 | −8.49 |
| SLVSilver (SLV) | 0 | −3.68 | −7.06 | +10.41 | −47.26 |
| Bitcoin | |||||
| BTC-USDBitcoin | 100 | +1.14 | −0.58 | +22.93 | −37.79 |
Breadth was poor but not indiscriminate. SPY closed 761.78, -0.69%; QQQ 707.39, -1.31%; IWM 290.51, -1.16%. The Nasdaq's loss ran roughly double the S&P's, and the Dow finished down about 0.79% near 52,767 (Motley Fool market wrap). The cleanest read on the *character* of the selling comes from the factor tape rather than the index tape: Invesco's S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF fell about 0.2% while its High Beta counterpart dropped 2.1%. A ten-to-one spread like that is not a growth scare. It is a discount-rate event, and it was authored in the bond market well before it reached equities.
The 10-year Treasury pushed to roughly 4.79–4.81%, its fifth straight advance and highest since January 2025, with the 30-year near 5.26–5.28% (Trading Economics, Forbes). That is only the domestic half. The half most US-only desks under-weighted today: Japan's 10-year JGB touched 3% for the first time since 1996 and the 5-year set a record 2.26%; the 10-year gilt hit its highest since 2008 and the 30-year its highest since 1998; euro-area yields printed fresh decade-plus highs (Reuters via BNN Bloomberg). Reuters framed the driver as a three-body problem — energy-driven inflation, monetary tightening, and deteriorating G7 fiscal arithmetic. When the anchor tenor of the world's largest carry-funding market breaks a thirty-year ceiling, the repricing does not stay in Tokyo. That is the mechanism behind a US session in which the most-owned duration assets — software, crypto-levered equities, high-multiple AI infrastructure — absorbed the worst of it.
USO closed +5.46% at 141, with WTI up roughly 5.7% near $90.67 and Brent back above $90 (Trading Economics). The catalyst was kinetic: two tankers, one Saudi and one South Korean–owned, were struck Monday night; US forces hit Iranian military assets after detecting preparations to mine the Strait of Hormuz; Iran answered with missile and drone attacks on US facilities in Jordan (TheStreet, Trading Economics). Hormuz carries close to 20% of seaborne crude, and Goldman has published a scenario in which Brent reaches $110 on a genuine closure. Energy was the only S&P sector to finish higher (CappNotes), and the day's winners are the thesis in miniature — integrateds, refiners and E&P bid, the airline complex sold.
Note the reflexive loop the session actually traded: higher crude lifts inflation expectations → hike odds rise → the long end backs up → everything priced off it compresses. Equity weakness was the fourth derivative of a shipping-lane story.
This is where an off-leash read earns its keep. GLD fell 2.86% to 396.75 and SLV dropped 3.68% to 57.92 — on a day featuring a live Middle East supply shock, a synchronized global bond rout, and a 5%-plus oil spike. Gold had just booked roughly a 10% August, one of its strongest months in decades (MINING.com, India Infoline). If bullion cannot hold a bid into an escalating Hormuz confrontation, then the marginal holder was never buying a geopolitical hedge — they were buying a rate-cut option, and the Jackson Hole repricing took it away. Metals traded today like a long-duration asset, not a safe haven. Anyone holding gold as portfolio insurance should treat this session as evidence the insurance is currently correlated to the thing it is supposed to insure against.
The biggest gap between the curated feeds and the open web today is directional framing. CME FedWatch has September hike odds near 65–68%, up from roughly 36% before Chair Kevin Warsh's August 28 Jackson Hole address, where he flagged the Fed's preferred inflation gauge near 3.7% against a 2% target (CNBC, Chase, prediction markets). July core PCE at 3.3% underwrites it. Goldman's trading desk described "increased investor nervousness and cautious risk allocations" into the tape, and 2s10s widened to roughly 40bp. Friday's August payrolls report is now a genuinely two-sided event: a hot print validates the hike, a cold print collides with an energy-driven inflation impulse the Fed cannot comfortably ease against. That asymmetry is why a 0.69% down day badly understates how much repositioning happened underneath it.
Crypto-levered equities fell 6–8% while bitcoin and ether were roughly flat over 24 hours (24/7 Wall St.) — a pure beta-and-duration flush with no crypto-native catalyst. Cybersecurity gave back 5–7% in a post-print cooldown, where guidance and deal-making, not demand, did the damage. Optical and AI-adjacent hardware sold off ahead of a marquee optical print later this week. And in the middle of it, Apple rose 2.6% on the day John Ternus formally succeeded Tim Cook as CEO, with Cook moving to executive chair — an April announcement executing exactly on schedule, and the rare megacap bid in a tape that had almost none. Read that as the market paying up for a cash-generative, low-duration asset, not as a tech recovery.
The group traded as the highest-duration expression of the rate move rather than on any fresh demand datapoint. Context matters: the complex is still working off a drawdown of nearly 30% from its late-June record after a triple-digit run into that peak, so every back-up in the long end reopens the same valuation argument. Today's selling was multiple compression, not an order-book signal.
Broad-based de-rating across the compute-buildout supply chain, with diversified AI-innovation ETFs down more than 1% on the session. The buildout narrative was not challenged today — its financing cost was, which is the more durable risk. When the 30-year sits above 5.25%, projects with revenue three years out get marked down first and hardest.
Laser and component names were among the worst-hit corners of tech, with several down 5% or more against a 1.3% Nasdaq-100 decline. This is a high-beta group with an intact structural story and no valuation cushion, so it amplifies risk-off sessions in both directions. Nothing in today's action speaks to the underlying interconnect bottleneck.
Optical networking and high-speed interconnect sold off ahead of a significant sector earnings print later this week, an unusually sharp de-risking into a catalyst for a group that has beaten estimates consistently this year. That combination — heavy positioning, hard pre-print trim — sets up an outsized two-way reaction. Treat this week's optical results as the group's near-term referendum.
The firm-baseload-power-for-AI theme was one of very few places money worked today, but note the shape: the day's marquee catalyst was a 396-megawatt geothermal power purchase agreement with a hyperscaler, not a reactor deal. The theme is broadening from nuclear specifically into any source of 24/7 contracted power, which dilutes the scarcity premium nuclear names have carried. Meanwhile the regulated utility sector overall fell about 1% as a bond proxy — the power-for-compute trade and the utility trade have decisively separated.
A group left for dead on open-ended litigation risk put in a strong multi-day advance, with individual names up mid-to-high single digits while the broader utility sector fell as a rate proxy. Outperforming your own sector by 700–900bp on a day the long end is backing up is not a yield-driven bid — it is a re-rating of tail risk. Worth watching whether it holds through the week.
A multi-year laggard caught a real bid in a tape where defensives outperformed and consumer-defensive led gainers. The group has been valued for structural decline for so long that any margin stabilization moves the stock disproportionately. Early, but it is showing up on up-days now instead of only on down-days.
Biotech has been quietly breaking out all year — small-cap biotech benchmarks are up nearly 40% in 2026 against a mid-teens broad healthcare sector — and today it produced one of the market's largest single-name gains on trial-driven news while the AI complex sold. This is the clearest live example of leadership migrating away from compute and toward idiosyncratic science. Notably rate-insensitive relative to its beta, which is unusual and worth understanding.
A group deep into a multi-year downcycle traded up more than 3% against a broadly negative tape. Rising energy and input costs cut both ways here, but a bid on a risk-off day suggests the cycle-trough argument is starting to find buyers. Thin evidence so far — one session, not a trend.